I AM SHOCKED — SHOCKED! — TO FIND NO WMD HERE! It has long been a hobbyhorse here at MALT that the original rationale for war in Iraq — Iraq’s development of nerve and germ agents — was much-hyped in the immediate aftermath of war but has since been elbowed off the stage in favor of the “we heroes are here to liberate the oppressed people of Iraq” mantra. The reason for the shift being? Ain’t no such weapons. Judith Miller, of the NYT, was one of the main proponents of the “we’re finding evidence of WMD” meme. Now, Howard Kurtz of the Post reveals how and why Miller and the Times were so wrong: she was having her info fed to her by Ahmed Chalabi (as was MET-Alpha, the Army’s team looking for WMD).
You can imagine the insane grin on Howard Kurtz face as he typed this piece, based on an internal Times email. But as gleeful as the Post always is when sticking it to the Times, Kurtz does a good job of reminding us why this is a big deal–our collective memory is getting shorter and shorter. The people of the United States and of the world were lied to, flat out lied to, in preparation for this military boondoggle, and it is important that we work to remember that, and remind others. Next year is an election year, after all.
[UPDATE: Jack Shafer in Slate has extensively debunked Miller’s WMD reporting, based on Chalabi’s WMD lies, here.]